Analysing the Tata- Mistry Feud: A Quest for Balancing the Stakes and Upholding Corporate Democracy

Authors

  • Nisha Sardana Department of Law, Banasthali Vidyapith, Jaipur, India
  • Parul Dogra Department of Law, Banasthali Vidyapith, Jaipur, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53361/dmejm.v2i01.8

Keywords:

Company Law, Corporate Democracy, Corporate Governance, Indian Corporate, Tata and Mistry Case.

Abstract

The tussle between the two eminent groups finally came to a halt in this very year of 2021 after the Supreme Court gave its decision in the Tata and Mistry case. This case mainly revolves around the concept of Corporate Democracy which implies that the majority plays a key role in decision making of a company. This research paper delves into the case of Cyrus Investments vs. Tata Sons. Authors critically analyses the prevalence of Corporate Governance and Corporate Democracy prevalence in India. Paper further deals with aspects regarding the situation of Minority Shareholders.

Downloads

Published

2020-12-18

How to Cite

Sardana, N., & Dogra, P. (2020). Analysing the Tata- Mistry Feud: A Quest for Balancing the Stakes and Upholding Corporate Democracy. DME Journal of Management, 2(01), 65–71. https://doi.org/10.53361/dmejm.v2i01.8

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 01 (2021): DME Journal of Management

Section

Articles